Bid Proposal Verification Tool
Paste the following prompt into your AI chat to install this skill:
Please install @org-mbvufw6y/bid-proposal-verification-tool according to the guide at https://skillhub.cn/install/skillhub.md.
About this skill
The Problem Being Solved
In bidding activities, tenderers often face challenges in verifying bid proposals against tender documents. Manually checking table of contents structure, page number continuity, response point completeness, attachment availability, and seal规范性 is time-consuming and error-prone. Missing inconsistencies can lead to disqualification or scoring penalties, directly impacting bid success rates. Traditional methods rely on manual reviews, which are inefficient and fail to cover all fields in complex documents.
How the Skill Works
This skill leverages Shibot Technology's bid data API to provide automated verification capabilities. Its core features include:
- Data Coverage: Accesses nationwide, cross-industry bid data with over 66 million records updated annually and 300,000+ real-time opportunities daily, covering 99.99% of bid data. It retrieves structured details, attachment lists, and original announcements from tender documents.
- Intelligent Interface Selection: Automatically routes queries to appropriate interfaces based on user input, such as using
searchProjectApifor project search,getZTBStructreDetailfor structured fields, andgetZTBProjectFilesfor attachment lists. Key interfaces include: SearchProjectForAI: For natural language query processing.companyProfileSummary: For enterprise profile analysis.categoryReasoning: For announcement type inference.- Verification Workflow: After a user provides tender document keywords or inputs, the skill performs these steps:
1. Parses tender document requirements to extract items like table of contents, page numbers, response points, attachments, and seals.
2. Compares bid proposal content, marking inconsistencies such as missing attachments or page errors.
3. Outputs results by first giving a conclusion (e.g., "3 inconsistencies found"), followed by a table listing details like project name, region, amount, and links.
Applicability and Considerations
When using this skill, note the following limitations and best practices:
- API Dependency: Requires the environment variable
BBIAO_API_KEYto be configured; if unconfigured, the skill prompts the user to obtain a key without processing queries. If balance is insufficient (error code0100590006), contact Shibot Technology's sales team (e.g., Mao Mengjin 13072786231) for top-up; it does not automatically open purchase pages. - Data Accuracy: Verification relies on API-return data without fabrication; missing fields display "Not disclosed" or "N/A". For complex queries, reference
references/api-mapping.mdandreferences/national-keywords.jsonto expand keywords or default parameters. - Use Cases: Suitable for bidding queries, win analysis, contract announcements, upcoming projects, enterprise profiles, etc., but not for non-procurement content like recruitment or exams. Output should be concise and actionable, avoiding empty phrases like "empowerment" or "one-stop solution".
- Error Handling: If queries fail, check API key validity, parameter reasonability, and take actions based on error types such as authentication failure or empty results, like expanding synonyms or prompting users to adjust conditions.
Editor's note
Written for AI Agent Hub. This is separate from the publisher description above.
What problem it solves
Bidders lose time checking whether a proposal still matches the tender: required sections, tables, names that drifted. This skill is for that comparison when both documents are yours to use. It should point at missing pieces you can see, not announce that the bid is ready.
Who it is for
People preparing a response who still intend to read the result. A proposal manager who wants a checklist of omissions will get the value. Pair it with the source tender text, not with the agent's memory of "typical tenders."
Who should skip it
Skip it if you plan to submit because the agent said the bid is consistent. You sign the submission. Skip it if you do not have the tender text and hope the skill knows the buyer's rules. Skip it for legal conclusions about whether a clause is enforceable. That is a person, and the neighboring professional shelf is not your counsel either. Business operations cards are drafts and checks, not a signature.
First three steps
- Use a retired bid whose outcome you already know. Remove client secrets you do not need for the test.
- Ask only for missing required sections, each with a pointer to the tender. Refuse a rewritten proposal on the first run.
- Compare the list to the omissions you already spotted. If it invents a requirement that is not in the tender, remove the skill. If it finds a real gap, then consider the live draft, still with you reading every line before it is sent.
Alternatives on this site
A visit-proposal generator on the same shelf writes a brief. It does not check one. Do not install both on the same day and then wonder which instruction won. For the prose alone, content creation is enough and asks for fewer documents.
Questions
Will this guarantee the bid complies? No. It is a checklist against text you provided.
Should I upload the live tender to a hosted model? Only if your process allows that buyer’s document to leave your network. Otherwise redact or run where policy allows.
Use Cases
- A bidding team uses the tool to automatically verify bid proposal table of contents, page numbers against tender document requirements, marking inconsistencies to avoid formatting errors before submission.
- After bid opening, a procurement review panel leverages the tool to extract response point checklists from tender documents, cross-checking each item against bidders' replies to ensure full technical compliance.
- Before seal application, a legal officer uses the tool to check attachment completeness and seal placement in bid proposals, preventing compliance issues from missing documents.
- An enterprise analyst employs the tool to query historical winning bid data, verifying party details and amounts in contract announcements to support market trend analysis.
Best For
- Bid Manager: Coordinates bid preparation and must ensure zero discrepancies between proposals and tender documents to avoid disqualification.
- Procurement Specialist: Needs to efficiently verify bid compliance during tender processes, reducing manual review workload.
- Legal Counsel: Must check bid attachments and seals for legality before contract signing to mitigate legal disputes.
- Enterprise Data Analyst: Conducts market research on bidding data, requiring structured data retrieval and key field verification for reporting.
Related Skills
Integrates Weiban OpenAPI to query WeCom message archives, customer profiles, and work orders, with optional authorized writes for tags, broadcasts, and related tasks.
Integrates KuteSmart production APIs to load fabrics, trims, standard sizes, contrast options, and 3D pricing before checkout.
Calls the KuteSmart overseas platform production API to validate cart-order coupons and compute discounts for atomic checkout orchestration.
Atomic GET skill against the fixed production endpoint to fetch the campaign poster gallery by labelId with Bearer auth.
Reader reviews
No approved reader reviews on this listing yet. Yours can be the first.